DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY aw
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7Oi Ss. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: wr6ee18-14
31 July 2014
pear Gunnery Sergeant a7
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive gession, considered your
application on 31 duly 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
da procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
regulations an
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
r application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Roarad considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps performance
Review Board (PERB), dated 30 May 2014, a COPY of which 1s
attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. tn this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are
entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ed Sf
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10592 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5198 14
You requested removing the fitness reports for 1 January to 25 June 2007, 11 July to 31 December 2009 and 19 May to 31 December 2010. It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report for 1 January to 25 June 2007 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] is assigned to the Body Composition Program.” and “SECT[ion] A, Item 5a: MRO is currently assigned to the Body...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1694 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1693 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1698 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive sessicn, considered your application on 10 April 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official» naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6907 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 May 2014, a copy of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5141 14
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB} dated 9 April 2014, the undated notes _ from the PERB, and the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC dated 28 May 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5200 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4253 14
S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100) ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JSR Docket No: NR4253-14 2o May 2014 Dear Gunnery Sergeant Sy This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5943 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB}, dated 5 May 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.